Tuesday, August 19, 2008

OOS: Return to Clambake Nation

Above: A rendering of the culinary nations of North America. Modern political borders are shown in white. Note that culinary nation borders are in a constant state of change, and that many of these nations overlap one another. Also note that smaller microstates exist within these greater areas (e.g., The Scrapple Republic of the Greater Philadelphia Metro and the Lebanon Bologna & Peanut Butter Free State of South Central Pennsylvania, to name just two), resulting in a patois of flavors and experiences, even in areas that are firmly within some larger nation. This graphic was originally produced for an article in the New York Times.

Imagine yourself in the rural, rolling hills of northern Lancaster county Pennsylvania. This is an area of traditional, small holding farmers and traditional small towns, and those hills that will give way to the blue ridges of the Appalachians to the west. It is a wholly bucolic place, but it is also a land of great conflict and difference. This is because northern Lancaster county happens to be the confluence of four different nations, each with its own tastes and traditions. From the North and West, Maple Syrup nation, sparsely represented but a real presence, following the rhythm of the seasons as they collect and process their harvest. From the South and West, Chestnut Nation, a mysterious gathering, who do battle with squirrels to collect the bounty of the mighty oak. To the South, stretching from the Chesapeake down the coast, Crabcake nation: a boisterous, welcoming people; well versed in the ways of the scuttling sea bugs, often as willing to eat a softshell on a bun as to go to the trouble of making a crabcake. These people are beer drinkers, boat sailors, friends, and neighbors. And from the east and north, the Clambake Nation. These are our people: our nation, our heritage, our tradition. We gather together to build fires and steam clams, to eat the best sweet corn on the planet, to consume mountains of cole slaw and piles of fresh tomatoes, and to - when it has all been eaten - follow it with a chaser of the butter we soaked our clams in during the meal.

These nations are not fixed, not separated by trenches or walls - no, the national borders are fluid, and as such a Clambaker could live next to a Maple Syrupian, an Chestnutter next to a Crabcaki. There are even some blended families; though for obvious reasons the sea-based nations are more likely to intermarry with one another than with a sylvan nation, and vice versa.

Now, while many of us are born into these nations, in the end nationality is an affiliation of choice. Some choose not to be a member of any one of them, preferring instead to enjoy them as we pick and choose. Some are members of tiny subnations, limited to a town or metro areas. Others gradually switch from one to another as time passes. And still others find themselves orphaned, and so they join a new nation, taking the traditions and tastes of others as their own.

This last way is how Jacob's family came to be proud citizens of the Clambake Nation. It was during the second world war, and due to a chronic health problem, Jacob's grandfather was unable to enlist. He was able to complete his patriotic duty building B-26's in Baltimore, however, and during this time he developed a taste for clams. Why he chose clams and not crabcakes is lost to history (though we suspect that the generous use of butter in clam eating had something to do with it), but no matter how it happened, to this day we annually gather from all points of the country to eat ungodly numbers of bivalves and renew our family ties once more.

Loyal readers know that we feel very strongly about food and fellowship. This is a core belief for both of us. For Jacob, this belief comes from many sources, but the annual gathering that his family refers to simply as "The Bake" is perhaps the primary font from which this passion flows. So today we're sharing a few moments from it with you, because as important as working through Chef Picard's opus is to us, at the end of the day this is how WE do it.

This is Pennsylvania, so we don't mis en place: we fill up our steamer. We start empty, adding a wooden bracket that keeps the food off the bottom of the steamer (and out of the water). Then we add potatoes, right out of the garden this morning:

Clambake: Step 1

And follow that with onions, from a roadside stand nearby:

Clambake, Step 2

Now, cover these sturdy things with a few layers of corn picked this morning:

Clambake, Step 3

Until the steamer is nearly filled:

Clambake, Step 3.5

Then, top it all off with about 12 quarts of clams:

Clambake, Final Step

And spread to even them out:

Clambake Finalization

Now, we add about 12 quarts of water, cover, and take to the firepit, which as been burning for some time now:

IMG_4990

While this is all steaming, we take the opportunity to melt a wee bit (about a gallon) of locally made butter:

A wee bit of butter

And to prepare side dishes (tomatoes, salads, cole slaw, and the like) for the onslaught.

After an hour or so over the fire (about halfway through we add brats to the mix), everything's ready so out they all come:

Coming out of the Bakery

Now we make sure to have the right beverage and "sauce" on hand:

IMG_4993

And then, we assemble our plates from the platters of goodness:

IMG_4976

And that, friends, is all there is to it. When everything turns out well (which everything did this year, and does most years) you end up with an orgy of flavors, freshness, and joy. The buttery goodness of the clams, the sweet pop of the corn, the tomatoes that have more to them than anything you'll find in the store, and a flood of other flavors and foods... and this year, the vegetable soup that starts the day's eating correctly (way to go Constance!).

Note to selves: Eat more clams.

Time, mis to eat: No real mis here. Time over the fire was about an hour; but there was a substantial amount of prep and harvest beforehand.

Blast from the past: A little more about him and her, in case you need context.

Next up: Tomato sauce! (Honest.)

P.S.: Special thanks to the entire Hagy clan for another wonderful, well-worth-the-trip, Clambake. See you in 2009!

Monday, August 11, 2008

Mission: Monster Lobster

Consider the lobster: a primordial creature, scuttling along the bottom of the sea, constantly on the lookout for prey (or other lobsters), the proud carrier of some 100,000 neurons or so, unburdened by anything resembling a brain: essentially a giant, primitive bug.

The lobster, it is safe to say, has no inner life. It moves about, attracted by whatever it is that attracts lobsters, and eventually finds its way into a trap. The trapped lobster is tossed into a hold, transported to your area, and dunked in another tank with a bunch of other lobsters. At the market, some of those lobsters snooze. Some of them "fight." And some just scuttle around. But one of them eventually ends up on the scale, ready to come home with you, just so:

IMG_4817

(Now this recipe is called "Monster Lobster," and in the book Chef Picard uses a 5 lb bruiser for his work. After due consideration we decided to go with a smaller specimen - about 1 1/3 lbs - instead. Neither of us have much experience cooking these little fellows but we have heard that larger lobsters are often rather tough; and beyond that (and more importantly, frankly) 5 lb lobsters do not seem to exist for sale in Northern California. So we compromised. Seeing that (spoiler alert!) we were stuffed after eating this size, we think it was the right decision.)

Back to business. Quare: What goes well with lobster? Butter, or even better, hollandaise! So while our friend the lobster - Valentino Metallica is what we named him - enjoys the confines of a cardboard box inside our fridge, we got to building the sauce. Now: there is some dispute on the proper hollandaise base. Tradition, and Chef Picard, use clarified butter. But Jacques Pepin (in Complete Techniques) uses simply melted butter, which while waterier does produce a sauce (he says) that is more heat tolerant and less likely to break. (Faithful readers will remember that we do have a problem with breaking sauces in our kitchen.) We went with tradition on this one - because we TICP, and because Jacob wanted to make a "proper" hollandaise, and because... well, it is Chef Picard's recipe, not ours, eh?

So first we clarify:

IMG_3602

Over low heat for a bit, until everything is melted, and then we skim to see this:

IMG_3603

It was in focus in real life, we promise. From here, we have a brief pause for a "meez:"

IMG_3609

Again with the focus! Well, it had been a long day, we suppose. Anyway, from this point we take our fabulous new ball whisk and bust on it 'til white meat shows:

IMG_3611

Then, when done, we put it into a vessel and kept it warm.

Now, while Jacob has been furiously working his sauce thang in the hot, hot kitchen, Valentino Metallica has been chilling (as it were) in the cool, cool fridge. He's had quite a life, but now it's about time for him to sacrifice himself for the good of the order. So after a pep talk from our mascot:

IMG_3620

And our dog:

IMG_3622

Into the steamer he went. Being a lobster, he felt nothing; but he did turn a wonderful shade of red after the appropriate time:

IMG_3623

Meanwhile, we had steamed some asparagus. At this point we were ready to take the tomalley from the thorax and mix it up with some of the hollandaise (so we did that). Next we removed the tail meat and filled the tail up with hollandaise and then replaced the meat. Then we drizzled some hollandaise-tomalley over the shell, put some potatoes down along with the rest of the asparagus, and stuck it in the broiler for a moment. Then out it came:

IMG_3638

And then into our bellies.

Now a few words about this meal. Actually, just one: RICH. As if we should be surprised, right? But really: RICH. Whoa. Boy. As we mentioned - what you see plated here was more than enough for the two of us. And we had had a long and busy day and were hungry, so that should tell you something.

Other things: as mentioned, this was Jacob's first time making a hollandaise, and he was very pleased at how it turned out (and how not-difficult it was). Sure, we've made bechamel, we've made aioli, we've made mayonnaise; but there's something intimidating about hollandaise (and that something is called the bain-marie, and the resplendent warnings to closely watch temperature so the egg yolks don't scramble while you're making the sauce) and something very satisfying about making a darn good one. Which this one was. (Sorry, Chef Pepin: we won't be trying your version for awhile, at least.)

The tomalley-hollandaise was... like lobster flavored hollandaise. Neither of us had had tomalley before (Jacob had always heard that people ate it, but never knew anyone who actually did, and Melissa was unfamiliar with it) and we were a little put off by it; but it was quite nice.

The dish on the whole, aside from being RICH (did I mention this was a RICH dish?), was very good. Definitely excellent overall; the asparagus played very well with the lobster and hollandaise; giving an excellent base flavor for the others to take off from.

Note to selves: Why are lobsters so expensive? Is that they must be kept alive and in a controlled environment during transport? Or is it prestige? Or what? Also, if they're so expensive, then why did the lobster fishing version of Deadliest Catch fail to be even slightly interesting? Couldn't they afford writers at these prices?

Time, mis to eat: Well, we didn't have a formal mis this week - except for the hollandaise. So let's say about 75 minutes, including steaming times.

Next Up: Tomato sauce. Using 30 lbs of tomatoes from the farmer's market. Yeah, you heard us.

Blast from the past: Watching a sauce break is like watching a car wreck in slow motion.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Rock on Pork!

In case you were wondering... THIS is how we feel about pork! Rock on, pork!!! Rock out with your trot(ter) out!



We'll see you soon, little piglet... in the KITCHEN.

Monday, August 4, 2008

Mission: Fish & Chips

It's August already, again; it's the height of summer. You can tell because it's typically grey and brisk here in SF - while the rest of the country doubtless bakes, we wear heavy clothes and hats, because... well, I'm not going to say it's cold. No, not compared to other places. Not compared to Montreal, certainly. But it is not short weather. That's for sure.

So what do you do when it gets chilly in the middle of the summer? You turn inward - which for us means you head to the kitchen and start making stuff. That's our big mutual hobby - spending time in the kitchen, collaborating on food, keeping each other company, automatically switching roles from chef de cuisine to sous chef and back. Melissa always says that she was never able to share a kitchen until she started cooking with Jacob. Jacob similarly never allowed "help" when he was making food until he started working with Melissa. Neither of us had much interest in doing so - having encountered many well meaning but clumsy or inattentive or easily flustered "helpers" in the past.

We've been making food together for just under five years now, and at this point we talk very little about the tasks at hand - unless it is a fiendishly complicated recipe (as some of these have been - we're talking about you, lamb shank confit) we are able to split the work wordlessly and talk about other things that strike our fancy, or entertain our (safely isolated and out of the workspace) guests with whatever gabble we can come up with. We have far too good a time in the kitchen. We laugh a lot. We drink a lot. We visit a lot. For that hour or so, we and whoever's watching us (just watching - we don't take help!) are completely in the moment. Which is where you're supposed to be, right?

That actually is the point. Sure, right, you gotta eat. And we wouldn't do this if the food didn't taste good. And yeah, okay, we do like sharing it and seeing that people from all over the world are spending time with us (we do welcome your comments, by the way). But really the reason we keep doing this week on week is because it's a hell of a lot of fun to spend time with friends and family this way; even when things aren't going as well as they should in the kitchen or in their lives or in ours. That's fellowship, and there are few things better to share than that.

You know what else is good to share? Deep fried things. Let's get to cooking, huh?

Mis! En! Place!

IMG_4756

So, this week we're doing fish and chips with two batters: a scotch batter which uses stout (Guinness) and baking powder, and a blond batter that uses a pale ale (Anchor Liberty) and what seems like an outrageous amount of yeast (seriously). The fish, which is wrapped nicely in the paper there, is halibut; as called for directly in the recipe. We started with about 1.75 pounds of it.

So, first we mixed up one batter, and then the other, and then we put them aside for a while:

IMG_4764

These both doubled in size. Yes - that's a LOT of batter. Meanwhile we had peeled and cut the potatoes, and soaked them for an hour. (Chef Picard leaves the reader to their own devices when it comes to making the chips - so we followed the excellent recipe in America's Test Kitchen Best Recipe) Then we put them in for the first fry, and drained them:

IMG_4770

Then, we turned to the fish:

IMG_4776

Which we sliced into strips, and salted them, just so:

IMG_4785

Then we battered two ways. First we tried the blond batter:

IMG_4791

And within moments all we had left was this:

IMG_4778

So much for plating, eh? (Oh, that's the tartar sauce we made in the background. It was good too.) Okay, okay, we did plate. Blonde batter is on the bottom, scotch on the top:

IMG_4794

This was fantastic overall, though the blonde battered fish was the consensus favorite. Its was much lighter than the stout based batter, flakier, and tastier overall. The fish was perfectly cooked with a three minute dunk (that's what quality deep fryers get you, I suppose) and the chips were great as well (thanks, ATK). All in all this was an extremely easy dish, one that allowed us to do some serious visiting with our good friend who came over to help us wolf it down.

Note to selves: Next time we will skip the stout batter and just go with the blonde batter. Sorry, stout: you're better for drinking than you are for making fish batter.

Time, mis to eat: All told, about 90 minutes - half of which was spent waiting for the batter to rise.

Next up: Unclear! We're still kinda in fry heaven right now.

Blast from the past: Fiendishly complicated? Fiendishly good is more like it.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Mission: Foie Gras Pizza

Everybody loves pizza! You do! We do! The Ramones did! We mean... it's pizza. Everyone loves it.

Everybody loves foie gras, too. You do! We do! The Ramones did! It's foie gras, people! It's heaven!

(What's that you say? Some people may have serious ethical concerns regarding foie gras, you say? Bah! Consider this: if those people were to eat foie without knowing where it came from what would they think? Would they want more? Or would they not?

You know what they'd think. They'd love it and they'd ask for more. And if it were us, we'd serve it to them. And if they asked, we'd call it meat butter.)

So this week we're going to put two great tastes - foie and za - together. Let's see what happens.

Mis en place!

IMG_4736

So there's some salted foie we made a week or so ago, and pizza dough, and prosciutto (the book calls for lonzo, but we weren't able to source it easily: and the book does suggest going with prosciutto if needed). And figs!

Wait, figs?

Anyway, first we put the dough in the pan:

IMG_4737

And then we sauce it up, adding figs and goat cheese:

IMG_4741

And then we fired it for a while. When we were satisfied that it was about done, we put arugula (which we cannot spell correctly) on it and fired it again for 15 seconds or so to wilt it. Then we laid the prosciutto on top of that, just so:

IMG_4750

And then we put the foie on top. Here's a slice:

IMG_4753

And then we ate it up.

And the only word that came to mind was... meh. This wasn't an epic fail or anything (unlike, say, a certain cotton candy machine) but the dish was somehow a little less than the whole of its parts. We both got the feeling that the foie was added here because it could be added, not because it really brought anything to the party. Oh well.

Note to selves: We sure did have a good time at Melissa and Alex's wedding last week! Wahoo Melissa and Alex! Congratulations! Yay! Also, when salting foie, be sure to wrap it in plastic to keep it from drying out.

Time, mis to eat: About 45 minutes or so.

Next time: Fish and chips.

Blast from the past: Who cares where it comes from? It's good!

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Mission: Maple Ice Cream with Maple Cotton Candy

This week we continue Jacob's maple education with a dessert that was redonkulously easy on one hand, and redonkulously frustrating on the other. We're going to make some ice cream (easy!) and cotton candy (frustrating!) and put it all together in a bowl. Let's see how that works out.

First, the ice cream - or, more properly, custard - meez:

Meezing the cream

Simple, eh? The first thing we do is put the maple syrup on heat and start to reduce it. While we've done a little bit of this kind of thing before, this was the first time we realized that Maple Syrup is essentially sugar, and heating it is essentially candy making - an action that both of us have been alternately fascinated by (ain't it cool that small differences in heating can have such an impact on the cooled product! That's super awesome chemistry!) and terrified of (ain't it scary that small differences in heating can have such an impact on the cooled product? I'm scared now!) for some time now. Anyway, here's the syrup coming up to temperature:

IMG_4583

Once we got it to the right temp, we took it straight off the heat and started mixing the rest of the custard ingredients into it, stirring vigorously the entire time. We added the eggs last:

IMG_4585

From here we did some more stirring to combine everything, and then we took the whole thing and put it in the fridge overnight.

The next day, we invited two of our favorite test subjects friends over and they JUST HAPPENED to bring their ice cream maker along with them. So we poured the custard into it:

IMG_4588

And then we set it and forget it for 45 minutes or so. What could be simpler? This recipe has everything going for it: chemistry! Sweetness! Eggs! Sugar! Simplicity! Our expectations were soaring! We couldn't wait to try it! All we had to do now was make cotton candy - and how difficult could that be?

Oh.

Yeah... about that.

The cotton candy aspect did not turn out quite the way we hoped it would.

So for this dish we bought a cotton candy machine. We're usually not into unitaskers - in principal at least, we agree with Alton that the only unitasker one should have in the kitchen is the fire extinguisher - but we thought that in the spirit of the project! We should! Make our own! Cotton Candy! We MUST!

(And where would we find maple cotton candy, anyway? It's hard enough to find maple sugar around here! Clearly, we HAD to make it ourselves! That is what Chef Picard would want us to do!)

We did research and found a very cute (and pink! hello!) cotton candy machine on Amazon. It seemed reasonably priced, and seemed to promise a certain... level of performance, lets say. It came in the mail the day before we were going to use it, and we read through the instructions, which made still more promises regarding a certain level of performance:

What our cotton candy should look like

I mean, look at Figure G!! What a massive quantity of cotton candy! I'm getting a stomach ache just looking at it! Not that I won't eat it up and ask for more! Gimme!

And here's where the wheels, as it were, started to come of the wagon. Maybe we should have expected that, considering this warning label:

Important instructions

We had read that the machine's performance gets better the longer it was on - that is, the first batch was kinda sucky, but the second would be great. So the first thing we did was add just pure granulated sugar to the machine. Just to warm things up, you see. Just to make sure it worked, you know. So we added a tablespoon of sugar to the machine, and then another, and then another, and after about 20 minutes we had this much cotton candy:

Plain cotton candy

Okay. Well, the second batch will be better, right? So now we added the maple sugar to the machine. And then we added more. And a little more. And got no candy. NONE. So we went back to the computer for more research. It seems that the machine likes granulated sugar the best. The maple sugar we had was very finely granulated, so at this point - as a last gasp - we mixed up a batch of half maple and half plain sugar, like so:

1/2 maple, 1/2 regular sugar

And after three scoops (tablespoons) of that we took what we had and compared it to the plain cotton candy we had made earlier:

What it actually looked like

Epic, huh? Well, we did have enough for one dish, and so here is the final product:

Mission: Maple Ice Cream and Maple Cotton Candy

Then we split up the candy into four teensy little bits and ate up our portions.

And holy cow. This was good. The cotton candy added a nice dryness to the ice cream. The ice cream was very sweet, but not cloying, and we all enjoyed it. So maple ice cream? Great! Maple cotton candy? Super, thanks for asking! However...

Note to selves: Cotton candy machine? EPIC FAIL. Seriously. We're returning it. If we ever make cotton candy again we'll just rent an industrial version.

Time, mis to eat:
Not including the overnight chill on the custard, about 90 minutes for the ice cream. The cotton candy took about 45 minutes or so.

Next up: We're going to throw together a little thing called Foie Gras Pizza!

Blast from the past: We've loved foie for a long time... and this was truly two great tastes that went great together.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

OOS: Respect the Tip Jar

Ripped from the headlines of our neighborhood, we have a sad tale to tell about something we bore witness to - kinda - at our favorite butcher.

Last night we went to Avedano's to pick up some sausage and steak for dinner. We drove up and came right in - and the butcher locked up the door behind us! Turns out that they had just - just! - been robbed. Well, the tip jar had been stolen. (Yes, our butcher has a tip jar. And yep, we tip - they're really good to us, and are great about sharing knowledge and butcher lore, and... we're food bloggers, for god's sake, what do you want?) Apparently, some drunk came into the shop, asking for money, and then produced a knife and ran off with the tip jar.

So while one butcher was explaining it to us, the other one was calling 911. And the cops were there within about 30 seconds. Some response time, huh?

Anyway, we ended up getting our sausage (one pork, one lamb; we ate'em straight after putting on high heat for a few minutes - delish) and steak (grass fed flank, which we seared and ate up with some pita) and it wasn't until we left that I realized that there was something really idiotic, and almost hilarious, about robbing a butcher... wielding a knife.

Since no one was hurt, let's call it funny. And let's reflect for a moment. It's a well known fact (among the underworld types... I'm told) that one is to be especially cautious - and perhaps even not to trust - a man who keeps pigs. I would think that one would always be on one's best behavior around shop run by women who no doubt know many men who keep pigs.

And on the other hand, a knife - of all things? Against a butcher? It's well-established that bringing a knife to a gunfight is a bad idea; what level of bad idea-ness would we call bringing a knife against a butcher?

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Mission: Tomato Tart

This week we're off to a mysterious land known as Connecticut, exploring one of its darkest corners - known by the locals as Grennitch - to visit two dear friends who will soon be transported off to the British Crown Colony of Bermuda; where apparently there are all sorts of devilish things in store for them. (Things like rum, linen suits, reinsurance, expensive lemons, and the like.)

Our mission this week was to create the Tomato Tart - using an unfamiliar kitchen and untried (by us) tools. All missions require planning, and so we first created our mis en place:

IMG_4544.JPG

As you can see, unfamiliar territory - but we shall prevail! As you can see we've prepped our pastry and had it chilling since the night before, wrapped in wax paper, assuming the proper consistency. It's still a smidge early for tomatoes in Connecticut - at least in Grennitch - but we were able to find some lookers at the local Whole Foods grocery mart, as seen here:

IMG_4542.JPG

And so we were off! Melissa kindly took to slicing the tomatoes wafer thin while Jacob patiently plucked the teensy little leaves off an otherwise unsuspecting herb:

IMG_4549.JPG

And during this, our host Kris kindly whipped up the bechamel base for us:

IMG_4546.JPG

Isn't that ball whisk a looker? We're definitely going to get one. Because the three whisks we have are suddenly obsolete. Anyhoohah, once that was placed in a chilled bowl, we were ready for the second meez:

IMG_4552.JPG

Now comes the time on Sprockets when Jacob does battle with the pastry. Continuing to learn from previous disasters experiences, we had kept the dough in the fridge until the very last moment, and then once we got to work, we worked as quickly as possible, so quickly that there's but one picture of that process:

IMG_4553.JPG

And we are happy, beyond happy, to report that we were able to not only get the dough rolled out properly and quickly, we were able to get it up off the granite and onto parchment for the assembly, just so:

IMG_4554.JPG

And so assemble we did:

IMG_4570.JPG

And then into the oven at high heat for a very short period of time (20 minutes or so) and then out it came, looking like this:

IMG_4574.JPG

For a moment it looked like that. Then we ate it up. Greedily.

So the day before we made this dish we met some other friends in Algonquin Manhattan, and ate some really good pizza at a place on 3rd in the Mid-80's. It was really good - super good - a real good thin crust pizza, so good that you could just get a margarita or a white pie and be perfectly happy (we did actually get one of each, in addition to a pepperoni for good measure). It was one of those pizzas that makes an east coast transplant (like Jacob) suddenly sharp pangs of nostalgia and regret - nostalgia for the primeval feelings that for some reason surround pizza when you grow up on the eastern seaboard, regret because that dish really doesn't exist west of, say, the Susquehanna river - and maybe not even that far west - and no one has ever come close to having a reasonable explanation as to why that is, exactly. (Jacob thinks it's the water, but Jacob is full of it sometimes.) Basically which is to say, that those pizzas were freakin' good, much better than what we can get in the Bay Area at any price.

These tarts reminded some of us of those pizzas. Sure - okay - fresh pastry topped with fresh ingredients, made just across the sound from Long Island. Same air - different water, but same basic atmosphere; right? But there's no bechamel sauce on those Manhattan zas, nor is there nutmeg, nor did we fire these tarts in a pizza oven, or on a stone. But there was a resemblance, absolutely, and while there was some discussion about the cheese - gruyere was called for and used, half of us liked it, half of us thought maybe something different would be better next time - none of us were really unhappy about the result.

Not even close.

Note to selves: Get a ball whisk! What a clever device! And cute too!

Time, mis to eat: 45 minutes, not including the overnight chill for the pastry dough.

Next up: It's HOT in the Bay Area so we're going with... Maple Ice Cream with Maple Cotton Candy. Yeah, you read that right.

Blast from the past: The last time we made a tart, Jacob had a lot to learn - or, he claims, remember - about pastry.